Tribes
(based on Acts 11:1-18)
Do you remember last week’s New Testament
passage? If not, let me remind you;
It came from Revelation 7:9
“After this I looked and there before me was a
great multitude that no one could count, from every nation, tribe, people and
language, standing before the throne and in front of the Lamb.”
These words came from John, who had a vision
about heaven and what would be there.
And in his vision, John saw that there was such a large number of people
that no one could count them, there was so many. And surprise, surprise, they weren’t all the
same. There were people in heaven that
didn’t look like one another – there were tall people and short people, fat
people and thin people, there were people who had pale skin and people with
dark skin. Among them, they spoke many
languages, not all of them spoke Greek or Hebrew, but they spoke Spanish and
Italian, Japanese and Russian, English and Germany, Swahili and Tlingit. They came from every nation on earth. Currently, there are 195 countries in the
world. And there were people from every
one of them in heaven. And if you want
to get really specific, every tribe was represented, as well. So, not just every nation, but every group of
people that gathers on earth for a cause or a belief or an interest – every tribe!
Yet, if you recall your Old Testament history,
the world was separated by language, tribes and nations, nearly from the beginning. Do you remember the story, from the Tower of
Babel in Genesis?
So how do we go from not understanding one
another in Genesis and separating ourselves among only people of like interests,
skin colors, languages, nations, or tribes to a vision of heaven where everyone
is together?
This passage in Acts is supposed to help show
us how.
The early church was a Jewish Church. Jesus was a Jew, his disciples were Jews, and
Jesus’ ministry had been spent among the Jewish people. And although Jesus’ commission to his
disciples in Matthew 28:19 was to “go and make disciples of all nations,” up to
this point the followers of Jesus were still mostly just Jewish.
But now the church was beginning to see
Gentiles, or non-Jews, coming to faith in Christ, and this posed some
significant theological and practical problems. For example, the Jewish Christians continued
to observe the Old Testament food laws and circumcision, and one question that
arose was should Gentile Christians observe these same laws or not. If not, how were Jewish believers to maintain
their own obedience to food laws when fellowship in Christ involved eating with
unclean Gentiles? And how would close
association with Gentile believers affect the relationship of Jewish believers
with other Jews who did not share their faith in Christ? These issues were serious
theological issues. They were not to be dealt
with lightly. The Holy Scriptures from
God had told the Jewish people that THIS, what was written in the sacred text,
was to be their law. It was to be how
they conducted themselves before their God and in life. And now, the admittance of Gentiles into the
fold of believers was threatening the very core of their beliefs.
What we see is potential divisions emerging
between Jewish and Gentile Christians.
“What God has made sacred, you must not call
profane!” With these words the Apostle
Peter set off shock waves within the early church gathered in Jerusalem. The early church that had been so united in
its common experience of the resurrection of Christ and the Pentecost
experience of the Holy Spirit is now being threatened with a theological
controversy that could bring about upheaval and division.
How can Peter betray and abandon the sacred
traditions of his people? Just like John
wrote in Revelation years later, Peter, the rock upon which Christ said he
would build his church, has had a dream. And this dream, if it was to be taken
seriously would turn upside down everything that this gathering of Jewish
Christians held dear; the laws and customs of Judaism. What is at stake here in our text from Acts is
the very future of Christianity. Would
the Jesus movement be for Jews only remaining an obscure Jewish sect never
venturing beyond the boundaries of ancient Israel? Or would the Gospel of Jesus Christ transcend
its Jewish roots and become an explosive force spreading in every direction
across the known world?
It is remarkable that Luke, the author of Acts,
is willing to show us an episode in which schism threatened the fellowship of
the very first Christians. But I think Luke
wants us to see the church at its most vulnerable moment when it was in
conflict; why? Perhaps to show us that
we’re no longer talking about a religion that is separate from the conditions
of the human heart. That this faith is
about being real and honest, vulnerable and compassionate – because that is who
God is.
So, here the new sect of Jewish Christians have
the theological question about whether or not a follower of Christ (A Christian)
had to be Jewish. They were wrestling
with the question of how they were called to uphold all the laws and customs
that Jesus and the Apostles grew up with and practiced as faithful Jews; about
what to eat and what not to eat as laid out in scripture.
It would be easy for us to dismiss this as
irrelevant to us today, except the first church was dealing with a profound
issue that continues to grip the church today. It is the appropriate question of how a
community of faith defines who is in and who is out; who belongs and who
doesn’t. But what do you do when some
new-fangled idea comes along, something different from the way we were raised,
something challenging to what we believe?
Or, to put it another way: how do we know
something is from the Lord or not? Let’s
see what we can learn from this story of conflict. First thing we might notice is that the
conflict itself is acknowledged. This
story from Acts reminds us that sometimes we have to talk about difficult
subjects that have the potential to divide us.
The critics within the Jerusalem church said, “Wait,
hold on Peter! What are you trying to
tell us?” And it’s good that they did because
you can’t just go with every new thing that comes along without questioning it. It must be tested. So, the Jewish people had their traditions. Those traditions had been practiced for
centuries. They were written in the
Sacred text as law coming directly from God.
Because of those traditions and laws, in the chaotic world of the
ancient middle east, the people of Israel were able to say this is who we are. We are not Edomites or Egyptians or Assyrians
or Phoenicians. We are the people of
Israel. This is what we have done over
centuries to define ourselves; it is our way of life. It is how we celebrate that we are a people
set apart by God. Because we believe
ourselves to be a chosen people, we seek to follow God’s ways in being careful
about what we eat and who we eat it with.
When you have been raised this way, to believe
a certain thing like this - it is not just an opinion, or even a belief or
practice. It becomes part of your very DNA.
For Jews the idea of eating unclean food
was simply revolting. It brought about
an emotional, almost chemical sense of revulsion. This deep-seated feeling doesn’t easily yield
to theological arguments. You can’t
really even debate it no matter what you say or how rational you might be. A change of heart regarding a subject like
this for the Jews can only come from an even deeper place.
And that deeper place according to our story is
when one sees with one’s own eyes the Spirit of God doing a new thing; when one
sees the Holy Spirit working in people’s lives that you might have considered
unclean, outsiders, and even worse. It
is only in this way that one is shocked into a new awareness. And that is what happened to Peter. But notice what happened next. Peter did not respond to his critics with
countless theological arguments. He did
not angrily confront those who disagreed with him. He didn’t engage in an “us vs them” debate. He simply told them a story - his story.
He said these people came to me and invited me
to go with them. And to see what their
lives were like. And I went. And yes, I knew that I could be defiled by
associating with the unclean, but I went. I felt like God wanted me to go. And I saw that God’s spirit was working in
them in powerful ways. And this changed
my heart. This is my story, but it could
just as easily have happened to you. What
would you have done if this had happened to you?
This text offers this very important clue about
conflict in church. We will more likely
be able to resolve our conflicts and discern the will of God when we share our
stories. Not debate. Not arguments. Not name-calling. Just, this is my story. This is what I have experienced for myself. That’s what Peter did.
Now, there are a lot of years yet to
go between Genesis, when all of the people on earth were separated into various
tribes, and the Revelation as seen by John regarding heaven. This story from Peter, recorded in our Holy
Scriptures, is just one story about how we go from Genesis to Revelation. And that story, that quest, to be more Heavenly,
to usher in the Kingdom of God continues, even today.
Some day there will be a grand
celebration when all the Children of God sing and worship together before the
throne of the Holy One. Until that day
comes, we share our tribal stories.
4 comments:
Walt, this is so true! You have gently brought us to a place where we can listen to one another. I hope many more people read this and take it to heart!
Good insights!
Wonderful thoughts, Walt! Thinking about what you wrote, I think Peter’s prophetic dream was God’s way of giving him - and all the early Christians - a story they could understand, much like one of Jesus’ parables. And no doubt one reason Luke included the story (whether this was consciously his reason, or solely the inspiration of the Spirit) was because this would be only the first of countless controversies down the centuries. God wanted to reassure us that these differences could be navigated with faith and trust.
Your mentioning the difficulty of our understanding why the Jewish ritual law could be so divisive to the early Church also makes me think of one of my favorite passages from Chesterton:
“This is the thrilling romance of Orthodoxy. People have fallen into a foolish habit of speaking of orthodoxy as something heavy, humdrum, and safe. There never was anything so perilous or so exciting as orthodoxy. It was sanity: and to be sane is more dramatic than to be mad. It was the equilibrium of a man behind madly rushing horses, seeming to stoop this way and to sway that, yet in every attitude having the grace of statuary and the accuracy of arithmetic. The Church in its early days went fierce and fast with any warhorse; yet it is utterly unhistoric to say that she merely went mad along one idea, like a vulgar fanaticism. She swerved to left and right, so as exactly to avoid enormous obstacles. She left on one hand the huge bulk of Arianism, buttressed by all the worldly powers to make Christianity too worldly. The next instant she was swerving to avoid an orientalism, which would have made it too unworldly. The orthodox Church never took the tame course or accepted the conventions; the orthodox Church was never respectable. It would have been easier to have accepted the earthly power of the Arians. It would have been easy, in the Calvinistic seventeenth century, to fall into the bottomless pit of predestination. It is easy to be a madman: it is easy to be a heretic. It is always easy to let the age have its head; the difficult thing is to keep one's own. It is always easy to be a modernist; as it is easy to be a snob. To have fallen into any of those open traps of error and exaggeration which fashion after fashion and sect after sect set along the historic path of Christendom—that would indeed have been simple. It is always simple to fall; there are an infinity of angles at which one falls, only one at which one stands. To have fallen into any one of the fads from Gnosticism to Christian Science would indeed have been obvious and tame. But to have avoided them all has been one whirling adventure; and in my vision the heavenly chariot flies thundering through the ages, the dull heresies sprawling and prostrate, the wild truth reeling but erect.“
Post a Comment